Language Testing in Asia

Table 7 HAVAS 5 scores of participating children

From: Language proficiency analysis of Turkish children from high-income and highly educated families aged 5 in Antalya

		A	B	C	D		E
Participating children	E1	11^a	9^a	13	3		3
	E10	27	14	14	3		5
	E11	15^a	12	15	5		5
	E12	25	15	18	5		4
	E13	14^a	13	14	3		4
	E14	13^a	6^a	12	3		4
	E15	18	11^a	13	2^a		4
	E16	32	16	22	5		7
	E17	20	13	12	2^a		3
	E18	22	14	14	4		4
	E19	18	12	16	4		4
	E2	33	15	22	5		6
	E20	28	14	14	3		4
	E21	26	15	10^a	3		5
	E22	27	15	14	3		5
	E23	21	16	18	4		3
	E24	26	15	20	6		6
	E25	15^a	11^a	13	2^a		3
	E26	20	14	16	3		3
	E27	20	13	15	4		5
	E28	24	16	13	3		4
	E29	20	14	18	2^a		4
	E3	29	16	21	6		4
	E4	17^a	12	14	3		4
	E5	21	6^a	12	2^a		3
	E6	12^a	9^a	11	3		4
	E7	20	12	11	3		5
	E8	18	14	14	5		6
	E9	16	12	10^a	3		3
	K1	17^a	13	14	4		5
	K10	18	13	12	2^a		2^a
	K11	24	15	12	3		4
	K12	22	16	16	5		3
	K2	25	14	12	3		3
	K3	24	13	13	4		5
	K4	18	4^a	9^a	2^a		0^a
	K5	23	14	13	3		4
	K6	17^a	12	14	4		6
	K7	26	16	19	6		5
	K8	22	15	17	3		4
	K9	29	16	19	5		6

A: Task Performance category, B: Communication Competence, C: Vocabulary, D: Grammar, E: Sentence Formation
^aValues below the average for Hamburg or cut-off scores

Back to article page