Skip to main content

Table 1 Test prompt and scoring rubric

From: Self-assessment as academic community building: a study from a Japanese liberal arts university

Quality of understanding & response

Writing

Total

9-10 Strong understanding of core concepts, and strong, well-developed support for your opinion.

4-5 Strong paragraph unity and coherence with topic sentences (including key words from prompt) and transitions.

 

7-8 Satisfactory understanding of core concepts, with good development and support for your opinion.

3 Minor problems with paragraph unity or coherence such as topic sentences or transitions or minor grammar or word choice errors.

5-6 Basic understanding of core concepts and basic development and support for your opinion.

2 Some problems with paragraph unity or coherence such as topic sentences or transitions or minor grammar or word choice errors.

3-4 Only partial understanding of core concepts and much more development and support needed for your opinion.

1 Major problems with paragraph unity and coherence, lack of topic sentences or transitions and many grammar or word choice errors.

0-2 Little or no understanding of core concepts with little or no development or support for your opinion.

0 Little or no paragraph unity or coherence and pervasive grammar or word choice errors.

First Rater (Teacher) /10

First Rater (Teacher) /5

/15

Second Rater (Student) /10

Second Rater (Student) /5

/15

Third Rater (If needed) /10

Third Rater (If needed) /5

/15

Final Score /20

Final Score /10

/30

  1. Prompt: What ethical theory do you think could best be applied to guide decision making for an issue related to either race or gender?