Skip to main content

Table 5 Pairwise comparisons

From: The comparative impacts of portfolio-based assessment, self-assessment, and scaffolded peer assessment on reading comprehension, vocabulary learning, and grammatical accuracy: insights from working memory capacity

Dependent variable

(I) Condition

(J) Condition

Mean difference (I-J)

Std. error

Sig

95% Confidence interval for difference

Lower bound

Upper bound

Reading pretest score

Portfolio assessment

Self-assessment

.031

.325

1.000

 − .840

.902

Peer assessment

.309

.312

1.000

 − .530

1.147

Control

.151

.326

1.000

 − .723

1.025

Self-assessment

Portfolio assessment

 − .031

.325

1.000

 − .902

.840

Peer assessment

.277

.312

1.000

 − .561

1.116

Control

.120

.326

1.000

 − .754

.994

Peer assessment

Portfolio assessment

 − .309

.312

1.000

 − 1.147

.530

Self-assessment

 − .277

.312

1.000

 − 1.116

.561

Control

 − .158

.314

1.000

 − 1.000

.684

Control

Portfolio assessment

 − .151

.326

1.000

 − 1.025

.723

Self-assessment

 − .120

.326

1.000

 − .994

.754

Peer assessment

.158

.314

1.000

 − .684

1.000

Reading post-test score

Portfolio assessment

Self-assessment

.683

.999

1.000

 − 1.999

3.365

Peer assessment

 − 1.271

.962

1.000

 − 3.853

1.312

Control

6.210

1.003

.000

3.519

8.901

Self-assessment

Portfolio assessment

 − .683

.999

1.000

 − 3.365

1.999

Peer assessment

 − 1.954

.962

.268

 − 4.536

.629

Control

5.527

1.003

.000

2.836

8.218

Peer assessment

Portfolio assessment

1.271

.962

1.000

 − 1.312

3.853

Self-assessment

1.954

.962

.268

 − .629

4.536

Control

7.481

.966

.000

4.889

10.073

Control

Portfolio assessment

 − 6.210

1.003

.000

 − 8.901

 − 3.519

Self-assessment

 − 5.527

1.003

.000

 − 8.218

 − 2.836

Peer assessment

 − 7.481

.966

.000

 − 10.073

 − 4.889