Skip to main content

Table 5 Multiple comparisons

From: Group dynamic assessment vs. computerized dynamic assessment: impacts on L2 listening development, L2 students’ perfectionism, foreign language anxiety, and intrinsic motivation

Dependent variable

(I) Condition

(J) Condition

Mean difference (I-J)

Std. error

Sig.

95% confidence interval

Lower bound

Upper bound

Pretest scores

Bonferroni

GDA

CDA

−.06452

.34866

1.000

−.9155

.7864

CG

−.19689

.35463

1.000

−1.0624

.6686

CDA

GDA

.06452

.34866

1.000

−.7864

.9155

CG

−.13237

.35463

1.000

−.9979

.7331

CG

GDA

.19689

.35463

1.000

−.6686

1.0624

CDA

.13237

.35463

1.000

−.7331

.9979

Tamhane

GDA

CDA

−.06452

.35415

.997

−.9344

.8054

CG

−.19689

.34922

.923

−1.0555

.6617

CDA

GDA

.06452

.35415

.997

−.8054

.9344

CG

−.13237

.35297

.975

−1.0002

.7355

CG

GDA

.19689

.34922

.923

−.6617

1.0555

CDA

.13237

.35297

.975

−.7355

1.0002

Posttest scores

Bonferroni

GDA

CDA

−.90323

.85542

.882

−2.9910

1.1845

CG

6.84872

.87004

.000

4.7253

8.9722

CDA

GDA

.90323

.85542

.882

−1.1845

2.9910

CG

7.75195

.87004

.000

5.6285

9.8754

CG

GDA

−6.84872

.87004

.000

−8.9722

−4.7253

CDA

−7.75195

.87004

.000

−9.8754

−5.6285

Tamhane

GDA

CDA t

−.90323

1.01046

.756

−3.3860

1.5795

CG

6.84872

.71726

.000

5.0567

8.6408

CDA

GDA

.90323

1.01046

.756

−1.5795

3.3860

CG

7.75195

.79129

.000

5.7712

9.7327

CG

GDA

−6.84872

.71726

.000

−8.6408

−5.0567

CDA

−7.75195

.79129

.000

−9.7327

−5.7712