Skip to main content

Table 5 Factor analysis of mediating factors

From: How sociocultural factors mediate washback effect: a study of the Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education Examination English Language Paper 4

Pattern matrixa

Item

Factor

1

2

3

4

5

Factor 1: Family and tutorial influence

 S20. Tutorial schools’ advice on preparatory work

0.96

.07

 − .03

 − 0.14

.03

 S19. Tutorial schools’ advertisements

0.94

0.10

 − 0.11

 − 0.13

.06

 S21. Test-taking skills learned from tutorial school

0.90

.05

 − .04

 − 0.13

.06

 S24. Reports published by the media

0.69

.00

0.32

.09

 − 0.27

 S22. Information for preparatory work on websites

0.69

 − .02

0.18

 − .02

.07

 S17. Family’s advice on preparatory work

0.66

 − 0.10

 − .07

0.23

0.25

 S23. Posts about preparatory work on online forums

0.56

 − .02

0.39

.01

 − 0.11

 S18. Family’s expectations

0.48

 − 0.16

.03

0.35

0.22

Factor 2: Interest in the language

 S04. The way I use English

.03

0.85

 − .02

.00

.06

 S05. The value of English as a language

0.14

0.77

.00

 − .04

 − .01

 S06. My prioritisation of English subject

0.16

0.72

 − 0.16

0.10

 − .04

 S03. My ambitions

 − 0.17

0.71

0.30

 − 0.12

0.11

 S02. My learning goal

 − 0.27

0.66

0.18

0.10

.08

 S07. My interest in the English subject compared to other subjects

0.18

0.64

 − 0.18

0.30

 − 0.20

Factor 3: Evaluation made by teachers

 S15. Teachers’ assessment of my English language ability

 − .02

 − .06

0.87

.08

.02

 S16. Comparisons made by teachers (e.g. scores with previous years or between classmates)

0.13

 − .09

0.70

.03

.09

 S14. Teachers’ expectations

0.13

.05

0.65

 − .02

0.12

 S25. The examination-oriented culture in Hong Kong

0.13

 − .01

0.63

.09

 − .08

 S13. Teachers’ advice on preparatory work

.05

0.19

0.60

 − .04

0.13

 S26. The importance of the HKDSE English exam in modern Hong Kong society

 − 0.17

.01

0.30

0.25

0.21

Factor 4: Language proficiency

 S09. My English score on school English examinations

 − 0.12

.09

0.16

0.76

.04

 S08. My English language ability

 − .08

0.18

0.12

0.71

 − 0.11

 S10. My performance in English classroom activities

.08

0.20

 − .03

0.53

0.13

Factor 5: Peer influence

 S12. Classmates’ score on the school English examination

0.19

 − .01

0.37

 − .08

0.62

 S11. Classmates’ preparatory work

0.19

 − .01

0.20

.07

0.59

  1. N = 199. The extraction method was principal axis factoring with an oblique (Promax with Kaiser normalisation) rotation. Factor loadings above 0.30 in individual factor are in bold. a rotation converged in seven iterations