Rubrics for writing performance evaluation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Student: | Date | Topic: | |||
Writing elements | Score | Level | Criteria | Comments | |
Content | 30–27 | Excellent to very good: The individual shows deep understanding and has significantly improved their writing, which is detailed and closely related to the topic | |||
26–22 | Good to average: The individual understands the topic to some extent but has basic writing skills. Their writing is related to the topic, but not detailed | ||||
21–17 | Fair to poor: The individual lacks knowledge on the topic and does not cover it fully or clearly in their writing | ||||
16–13 | Very poor: The writing does not show understanding of the topic, lacks content, and is not suitable for evaluation | ||||
Organization | 20–18 | Excellent to very good: The writing is clear and well-organized, presenting ideas logically and efficiently | |||
17–14 | Good to average: The writing is somewhat disorganized, but the main ideas are clear. There is some logic, but the flow of ideas could be better | ||||
13–10 | Fair to poor: The writing is unclear and lacks a logical flow of ideas | ||||
9–7 | Very poor: The writing does not communicate clear ideas, lacks organization, and is not suitable for evaluation | ||||
Vocabulary | 20–18 | Excellent to very good: This writing shows strong language skills, including the right choice of words, correct word forms, and appropriate tone | |||
17–14 | Good to average: The vocabulary used is mostly correct, though there are some mistakes in idiomatic expressions. These mistakes do not take away from the main message | ||||
13–10 | Fair to poor: The vocabulary is basic with frequent errors in word choice and usage, which sometimes makes the meaning unclear | ||||
9–7 | Very poor: The writing seems like a direct translation from another language and shows a lack of understanding of English vocabulary. It's hard to evaluate because of this | ||||
Language use | 25–22 | Excellent to very good: This writing has complex sentences with few errors in grammar, word order, and usage | |||
21–18 | Good to average: The sentences are simple and have some mistakes in grammar and structure, but the overall meaning is clear | ||||
17–11 | Fair to poor: The writing has many grammar mistakes, both basic and advanced, making the meaning often unclear | ||||
10–5 | Very poor: There are many major grammar mistakes, making it hard to understand the meaning or evaluate the writing | ||||
Mechanics | 5 | Excellent to very good: The writing follows conventions correctly, with rare mistakes in spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing | |||
4 | Good to average: The writing mostly follows conventions, with a few errors in spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing | ||||
3 | Fair to poor: The writing has many mistakes in basic writing conventions, and the poor handwriting further confuses the meaning | ||||
2 | Very poor: The writing consistently makes errors in basic conventions, and the handwriting is hard to read, making evaluation difficult |